Mumbai Attacks. Evidence Provided

I have been reading a few comments here and there and I saw numerous disturbing news detailing how the terrorists who indiscriminately slaughtered nearly 200 people in Mumbai were aided by some elements of the Indian security apparatus responsible for protecting the city. The rise of Indian religious terrorist organizations that have penetrated India’s military and politics were about to be known in Maharashtra ATS chief Hemant Karkare’s report. The movement is so strong, resourceful and organized that it threatens the Indian govt itself and warrants the label “India’s Hindu al-Qaeda”. India is now emerging as a new ‘terror central’. India is now grooming its own ‘Hindu al Qaeda,’ terrorist militias so that they can implement the Indian dream of India becoming the next superpower.

A new movie from The Bollywood Centrale

Mumbai attacks saw a new India, where rule of the jungle has been followed quite literally from the time the whole drama started. As this bollywood drama went on for a few days, there were always something “spicy” coming out of the Indian news. Political parties quickly jumped on the band wagon, and started asking for support very suspiciously I add, as IF it had been a genuinely sad incident , it would not have been focused on RSS, BJP, Bajrang dal’s political campaigns to increase votes. It seems that the Indian govt too, has seen too many Bollywood movies, and pretended to be the main actors of this movie all along, to this date.

Mossad and RAW

With Mossad and RAW allegedly working together with the Hindu extremists in India, Mumbai attacks are very likely to be planned by these three culprits too. According to Mumbai's Urdu Daily 'Sahara'Mossad was appointed by by Sai Baba Mandir trust to provide security to the famous religious shrines. Sahara News Bureau [SNB] report on the front page of Sahara Urdu Daily of July 27, further adds that "some security experts have wondered if through the excuse of security of Hindu temples, Mossad, which is notorious for counter-terrorism and counter-espionage all over the world and especially in Arab and Muslim countries, is allowed to step in Maharashtra state, the conditions will seriously deteriorate not only in Maharashtra, but all over India".

Janes information group, the world's foremost source on intelligence information, reported in July 2001 that "The Indian spy agency RAW and the Israeli spy agency Mossad have created four new agencies to infiltrate Pakistan to target important religious and military personalities, journalists, judges, lawyers and bureaucrats. In addition, bombs would be exploded in trains, railway stations, bridges, bus stations, cinemas, hotels and mosques of rival Islamic sects to incite sectarianism."

Ben Gurion on Pakistan, published in the Jewish Chronicle, 1967:

"The world Zionist movement should not be neglectful of the dangers of Pakistan to it. And Pakistan now should be its first target, for this ideological State is a threat to our existence. And Pakistan, the whole of it, hates the Jews and loves the Arabs.

"This lover of the Arabs is more dangerous to us than the Arabs themselves. For that matter, it is most essential for the world Zionism that it should now take immediate steps against Pakistan.

"Whereas the inhabitants of the Indian peninsula are Hindus whose hearts have been full of hatred towards Muslims, therefore, India is the most important base for us to work therefrom against Pakistan.

"It is essential that we exploit this base and strike and crush Pakistanis, enemies of Jews and Zionism, by all disguised and secret plans."

So far with the witness statements and evidence present, it is looking more and more like yet another orchestrated event by the architects of the New World Order. Mossad has already been exposed in fabricating such planned attacks on US embassy previously in Yemen (See the full article here).

Evidence and Questions

This Bollywood drama however raises many questions and concerns which are listed below:

1. Unlike other so-called Islamic jehadis with beards and turbans, the Mumbai terrorists came with strange looks, wearing jeans and T-shirts, clean-shaven, no turbans nor any sign of ‘Muslims terrorists. They appear to be very western.
2. According to the eye witness reports, they seem foreigner, and “fair skinned” according to Mr Pappu Mishra in this BBC report
3. Also in the same report: Gaffar Abdul Amir, an Iraqi tourist from Baghdad, says he saw at least two men who started the firing outside the Leopold Cafe. He was returning to his hotel from the seaside with a friend when he saw two men carrying bags and brandishing AK-47s walking in front of them, shooting. "They did not look Indian, they looked foreign. One of them, I thought, had blonde hair. The other had a punkish hairstyle. They were neatly dressed," says Mr Amir.
4. Mumbai’s ‘Pakistani terrorists’ were a funny brand of ‘Muslim terrorists’: beer guzzling terrorists. True to the fancy world of Indian movies, Mumbai’s Jehadis go to a bar and stock up on beer before they launch their crusade. Locals say the orgy of killings in Mumbai began from Leopold café, a cult city cafe and a favourite hangout of foreigners and locals alike. Witnesses say, Three men walked into the cafe, drank beer, settled their bills and walked out. Then they fished out guns from their bags and began firing. Now usually, Muslim Jihadis who attack the enemies of Islam, and pretty strict Muslims themselves, and are not used to drinking beer etc.
5. Some reports also talk about the use of powerful drugs like Cocaine etc.
   This is against the basic principles of Islam to use these drugs and it is frowned upon as a western "indulgence" by orthodox Muslims from the region. I thought that terrorists were meant to be fundamentalists? Meaning they follow their doctrine in a strict manner??
6. Passports were amazingly recovered from the bodies, as if the attackers actually wanted to express their or a particular nationality. This is also 911 style, seems like Bollywood directors are watching too many Hollywood movies in their attempt to become famous. This also smells every bit of Mossad. I mean how many Jihadis will think “hang on, let me carry my Passport on me, in case I need to get a visa before I illegally enter India by boat” AS IF!!!
7. Vilasrao Deshmukh, the chief minister of Mumbai, was reported to have said that two British-born Pakistanis were among eight gunmen seized by the Indian commandos who stormed buildings to free hostages. Many of the British News papers including “The Sun”(SEE HERE)published full page articles on how two of the attackers were from Bradford area, and that this was proved from their passports they were carrying on them. This soon changed to having found Pakistani passports story though.
8. It was also claimed by the Indian authorities (soon after claiming that two of the attackers were British) that now up to 7 of the attackers were British. (SEE HERE). According to this report “And reports tonight even suggested the Britons could have come from Leeds and Bradford - the same area as the London July 7 bombers.”
9. Seems like the attackers had planned to even come out alive, as none of them seemed to carry out suicide bombing style mission. IF the chief minister of Mumbai Vilasrao Deshmukh was correct in his statement above, then what happened to those 8 gunmen captured by the commandos as reported by “The Sun” here? How did they suddenly all disappear, and only Mr Qasab left in remand only to write a letter to PAKISTAN for help.
10. Media was widely reporting that there were IDs of terrorists recovered that show Malaysian and Mauritius IDs. However, such references disappear after Modi's arrival.
11. Mumbai terrorists (as shown by media) had close similarities with RSS cadres: The alleged lone survivor CO-INCIDENTLY happens to be the same guy whose pictures were conveniently captured by Indian photographers and as he walked to make his kill, intriguingly wearing a yellow band on his right hand wrist in the typical style of Hindu terrorist RSS cadres.
12. The attackers seem to use a boat and enter via sea when Pakistan actually border India on land too.
13. Was the Indian navy sleeping when these guys supposedly made their way to Mumbai. This also shows that the army/navy, and RAW itself is fully involved, unless the navy is so incapable of protecting its waters!!
14. The world famous photo shown above was taken by Sebastian D'Souza, a picture editor at the Mumbai Mirror, whose offices are just opposite the city's Chhatrapati Shivaji station. See link HERE. He is an eye witness to quite a lot of this drama, and says “I think they saw me taking photographs but they didn't seem to care”. Ofcourse they wouldn’t care, it is the publicity that RAW has sought in this drama, so it isn’t completely impossible that they might have even paid one or two photographers to take a few photos.
15. Mr Sebastian D'Souza further explains, the gunmen were terrifyingly professional, making sure at least one of them was able to fire their rifle while the other reloaded. By the time he managed to capture the killer on camera, Mr D'Souza had already seen two gunmen calmly stroll across the station concourse shooting both civilians and policemen, many of whom, he said, were armed but did not fire back. "I first saw the gunmen outside the station," Mr D'Souza said. "With their rucksacks and Western clothes they looked like backpackers, not terrorists, but they were very heavily armed and clearly knew how to use their rifles.
16. Masses of armed Police men were already hiding around the station where this already planned and scripted drama was being played. Mr Sebastian D'Souza says “There were armed policemen hiding all around the station but none of them did anything," he said. "At one point, I ran up to them and told them to use their weapons. I said, 'Shoot them, they're sitting ducks!' but they just didn't shoot back.”
17. Mr D'Souza added: "I told some policemen the gunmen had moved towards the rear of the station but they refused to follow them”. Were they just cowardly policemen or were they actually ordered to allow these attackers to take lives willy nilly, and roam free at will?
18. Local knowledge of the area and knowledge of police/army strategies and tactics. It was almost as if the entire team were co-ordinated by some method of communication. There could have maybe been a possible HQ advising them of where and when to make a move.
19. India’s warmongering rhetoric against Pakistan is partly a steam valve to deflect from the fact that they were given a specific warning that this would happen and not only failed to prevent it, but let the whole thing drag out for days. The CIA’s station chief in Delhi told Indian intelligence in September that terrorists were planning to arrive via the sea and attack the Taj Mahal hotel with small arms and/or bombs. Security measures around the hotel were increased in response to the warning but relaxed just days before the attack.
20. Unsurprisingly, the Indians killed all but one of the terrorists, a clean cut English speaking Pakistani, Azam Amir Qasab, who is singing from the same hymn sheet as the Indians implicating Pakistan and saying he was trained by Pakistan.
21. India has allowed this only survivor of this drama, to even write a letter at such an early stage to Pakistan itself!! How many prisinors who are responsible for murdering 200 plus would be allowed to write a letter and this letter to be taken by govt officials to a particular country one may ask. The answer is simple, probably in a Bollywood movie.
22. Mr Qasab apparently asks for help from Pakistan. No other Jihadis have evr sent such a letter asking ANY govt to help them directly. And what help would he be requiring, Pakistani forces to attack his prison and free him? I mean who would in their true mind expect a country to invade another country or something similar to free a man, who is responsible for killing so many? The answer is very simple again, it is also a fabricated story from the directors of Mumbai’s Bollywood industry.
23. What would Pakistan gain at a time, when US has gone through elections, and Pakistani army was busy fighting the American war on terror on the western border, apart from anger from the US, and pressure from other pro-US countries? It was a senseless massacre that will ultimately help the geopolitical agenda of nobody other than the Indians and the U.S., who now have the perfect pretext to expand bombing raids in Pakistan and entrench themselves in Afghanistan. So ask yourself, who benefits from this Bollywood movie?
24. If someone wears a cross around his neck, you assume he's Christian. If someone wears a Kippah, you assume they're Jewish. Similarly, if someone wears a Rakhi you'll assume it's a Hindu.You can ask yourself why a radical Muslim would wear a Hindu symbol of devotion in his last living moments.
25. 
26. The orange colour has significance because that is the same colouring used for the Rakhi that Hindus wear on their right wrist. It's a ridiculous insinuation that radical Muslims would want to associate themselves with a symbol of Hindu piety
27. The assassination of the chief of the anti-terror squad in Mumbai who was exposing the Indian fundamentalists involved in the recent bombings within India. These terrorist organisations such as Shuv Seena, Bud rung daal, Durga Vahiat, BJP, and RSS, were found to be working with the Indian army, and politicians. If the America's lap in the Pakistani government had any brains, they would have demanded that Mrs. Hemant Karkare, the wife of the Indian antiterrorism chief killed in the very first hours of Mumbai attack be allowed to speak up. Also, a retired Indian army officer, a close friend was told by Karkare in writing a few hours before he was killed that his life was under threat by Hindu terrorists and their handlers in the Indian military intelligence
28. Suddenly an unknown group Deccan Muhajadeen accepted the liablility, but India still insisted to them, that its not you, its Pakistan, simply because the drama script says so !
29. No clear demands presented by the attackers. Unlike other terrorists in similar situations, the terrorists in Mumbai did not demand anything. They didn’t even demand the release of their supposedly jailed colleagues or ask for money. Why? What was their target then? Normally during this kind of attacks, the attackers would only hold hostages if they have a requirement.
30. When religious organisation carry out such attacks, they would normally be proud to have successfully attacked and damaged their enemy. In this case, no one except an Indian group has ever claimed responsibility, not to mention that the group is a totally unknown group and is unlikely to have carried out such an organised attack of this level.
31. Prime Minister, Sonia & L.K. Advani visit Mumbai, but no clues or no claims about ISI or Pakistan. However, the Number One Indian Terrorist, Gujarat Chief Minister Narinder Modi rushes to Mumbai and declares that Pakistan is behind the attack without any doubt! Note: no other Indian chief ministers travel to Mumbai. Modi, the killer of 2,500 Indian Muslim women and children in 2002, offered rewards to every military man killed to the tune of several million Indian rupees, which is something that didn’t occur to either the Indian government or the opposition.
32. The timing of Mumbai terror is well planned, just before Indian state elections! So who will reap the benefit? Lashkar-e-Taiba or BJP? If ISI did it, then they must be . And they are not.

    What's next? ISI operated Tsunami?